On the judges’ front, the Court is yet to make headway to fill up the vacancies. As reported in the Indian Express, the collegium seems to be at an impasse regarding the elevation of Justice Akil Kureshi, Chief Justice of the Tripura High Court.
Bail Under UAPA Can Be Granted if the Accused is an Under-Trial Prisoner
In this three-judge bench judgment, the Court moved past its reluctance to grant bail under strict anti-terror laws. It categorically held that if an accused has spent considerable time as an under-trial prisoner, he deserves bail. ‘Gross delay’ violates a prisoner’s fundamental right to a speedy trial. This becomes a ground for the grant of bail. More here.
Constitutional Challenge to Sedition Dismissed
A group of lawyers, Aditya Ranjan, Varun Thakur and V Elanchezhiyan, filed a public interest litigation challenging S. 124A of IPC, 1860. This section defines sedition and criminalises seditious activities. They argued that sedition is being used to curb dissent and violate free speech. The CJI Bodbe led bench dismissed this plea as the petitioners did not have sufficient standing. He asked them to build a more concrete case and come back. In this post, we examine the historical challenges to sedition from Tara Chand  to Aditya Ranjan .
New Petition Seeks for State-Wise Grant of Minority Status
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, lawyer and politician, has challenged S. 2(f) of The National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 [“NCMEI Act”]. As per S. 2(f), the Central Government has unbridled power to declare a community as a minority. And the Government has neither adopted a scientific approach nor has it framed guidelines to determine minority status. So, the Supreme Court must hold S. 2(f) unconstitutional and declare that minority status must be granted by the State Governments based on state-wise population. On 9th February 2021, the Court transferred similar challenges before various High Courts to itself.