Hearing Reports
Hearing Reports
Challenge to Jallikattu Day #4: Mr. Sibal Argues Amendment Prevents ‘Unnecessary’ Pain and Suffering
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the State of Tamil Nadu, argued that the Amendment ensures Jallikattu is monitored and safe.
2nd Dec 2022
More
Hearing Reports
Demonetisation #4 (Noon): AG Venkataramani Claims Demonetisation Achieved Its Objectives
The Attorney General heavily relied on the outcome of demonetisation to argue its validity despite a strong pushback from the Bench.
25th Nov 2022
More
Hearing Reports
Demonetisation Challenges #4 (Morning): Arguments on the RBI’s Duty and Fundamental Rights
On November 25th, Sr. Adv Shyam Divan argued against the Union's 2016 demonetisation scheme.
25th Nov 2022
More
Hearing Reports
Demonetisation #3: Sr. Adv. P. Chidambaram Argues that Union Was Not Authorised to Carry Out Demonetisation
Sr. Adv. Chidambaram argued that the objectives and process behind demonetisation were arbitrary.
24th Nov 2022
MoreDemonetisation Challenge
Channel
SCO Daily: SC Contemplates Hitting Pause on GM Mustard
The GM mustard debate continued at the SC. Does GM mustard pose health risks, or are the concerns a disagreement among scientists?
2nd Dec 2022
More
Channel
SCO Daily: The Jallikattu Challenge
The case raises a number of questions about whether animals have rights and if the rules for Jallikattu contain sufficient safeguards.
2nd Dec 2022
MoreCase Calendar
Dec 5, 2022
Demonetisation Constitution Bench: Day 5 Hearing
Dec 6, 2022
Jallikattu Constitution Bench: Day 5 Hearing
View allCase Watch
Challenge to the Practice of Jallikattu
28 Nov 2022
Pending
Animal Welfare Board v Union Of India
The Supreme Court will decide if the practice of Jallikattu is protected as a cultural right under Article 29 of the Constitution of India, 1950
MoreDecriminalisation of Adultery
18 Oct 2021
Decided
Joseph Shine v Union of India
The Court decriminalised adultery, striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).
MoreChallenge to Union’s 2016 Demonetisation Scheme
12 Oct 2022
Pending
Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India
The Supreme Court will decide if the 2016 demonestisation scheme is constitutionally valid, and if it was applied in a reasonable manner. This case will determine the future course of the RBI and the Union government's powers to derecognise all notes of select denominations.
MoreFeatured
Court in Review: Defection of Assembly Members
The 10th Schedule of the Constitution of India bans members of the House from defecting from their political party. SCO traces how the Supreme Court has interpreted this Schedule since 1985.
Spotlight
Maharashtra Political Crisis: Are Party Defections and Party Splits the Same?
With the application of defection law being unclear, the SC will decide whether the case needs to be heard by a larger Bench.
More
Trending
Analysis
Review Petitions in the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has been granted the discretionary powers to review its own judgments under Article 137 of the Constitution.
19th Oct 2018
More
Analysis
Key Supreme Court Judgments 2021
We review the SC's most significant judgments in 2021.
29th Dec 2021
More
Analysis
2022 Half-Year Review: Key Supreme Court Judgments
The Supreme Court delivered key Judgments on Reservations, Sedition, OROP and the constitutionality of the FCRA Amendment.
4th Jun 2022
More
Analysis
Right to Privacy: Court in Review
An analysis of the history of right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
4th Jul 2017
More