Sec. 6A of the Citizenship Act | Day 2: The immigration issue persists in other border states, not just Assam, petitioners argue
Petitioners contended that the provision violates Article 14 by creating an unreasonable classification for Assam among states
Supreme Court upholds Group of Companies Doctrine, says non-signatories may be bound by arbitration agreements
Sec. 6A of the Citizenship Act | Day 1: People of Assam should not be reduced to a minority, petitioners argue
Senior Advocate Shyam Divan argued that Assam’s resources was unfairly burdened by unfettered immigration from Bangladesh
Pendency of Bills in Tamil Nadu | Day 3: Governor cannot withhold bills indefinitely, says Supreme Court
The Court directed the Governor and the Chief Minister to engage in a discussion and find a workable solution
CONSTITUTION BENCH LIVE
“Government officials should be made accountable if they resort to frivolous litigation”: Senior Advocate C.S. Vaidyanathan
Senior Advocate C.S. Vaidyanthan spoke about access to justice, accountability of government officials, SLPs at the Supreme Court and more.
The day before the Constitution was adopted, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar spoke about the contradiction between political and social inequality
Dec 7, 2023
Assam NRC Constitution Bench | Day 3
Dec 8, 2023
Pendency of Bills in Tamil Nadu | Day 4
Jan 10, 2024
UAPA Charges Related to Tripura Violence | Day 2View all
In re: Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955
The Court monitored how the State Coordinator updated Assam's National Register of Citizens (NRC), so as to ensure that the NRC was published as mandated by the Assam Accord of 15 August 1985.
The State of Tamil Nadu v Governor of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court will hear petitions filed by the Tamil Nadu government against the Tamil Nadu Governor's withholding of pending bills passed by the state legislature. This case concerns the obligations of the Governor under Article 200, which deals with the Governor's power to assent to Bills.
Mukesh v State of Tripura
The Supreme Court will decide whether to quash the FIRs against 102 people, out of which 4 were arrested, under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) for criticising the handling of the communal violence in Tripura. The Court will also decide whether Sections 2(1)(o), 13 and 45(d)(5) of the UAPA are constitutional.
For years, disability rights advocates have claimed weak legal enforcement. A PIL in the apex court has the chance to catalyse a reckoning
Resurrecting the constitutional function has the potential to change the way the Supreme Court of India operates
Analysing the Court’s work in numbers.
With SC on summer vacation, SCO recaps the notable judgements of the summer session of 2023.
As the Court gears up to decide the challenge against the special citizenship provisions for Assam, we outline the legal questions at stake
The top court’s decision to deny Manish Sisodia bail appears to fall short of its own concerns over personal liberty
If the seniority principle is followed, these 8 Judges will lead the Supreme Court of India as Chief Justice till 2031.