Cases | Judgement Pronouncement

1978 “Industry” test to be refined, old definition to determine pending cases

Majority held the reference maintainable and left pending disputes to be decided under the 1978 triple test

Analysis

What is the ‘definition of industry’ case about?

In a case that could reshape the country’s labour jurisprudence, a nine-judge Bench will decide the scope of the term “industry”

Cases

Definition of “Industry” | Arguments Matrix

We provide a snapshot of arguments put forth by parties over three days before a nine-judge Constitution Bench

Analysis

Public Interest, copyright and fair dealing: ANI v OpenAI

The Delhi High Court introduced a problematic factor of “public interest” when testing “fair dealing” under the Indian copyright act

Analysis

Vanashakti III restores rule and exception

A three-Judge Bench declares prior clearance mandatory, corrects the precedent record, and forgives every project already in the pipeline.

Definition of “Industry”

Decided

State of Uttar Pradesh v Jai Bir Singh

A nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in 5:4 majority held that the triple test laid down in Bangalore Water Supply v R Rajappa (1978) needs to be reformulated. All pending disputes will be decided on the basis of the triple test laid down in 1978

Challenge to the Transgender Persons Amendment Act, 2026

Pending

Laxmi Narayan Tripathi v Union of India

The Supreme Court will decide whether provisions mandating certificates and removal of the right to self-perceived gender identity violates right to autonomy, dignity and privacy

Constitutionality of the Places of Worship Act

Pending

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v Union of India

The Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which prevents the conversion of the religious character of places of worship.

Subscribe to SCO