Extension of CBI/ED Director Tenures Challenged

Dr. Jaya Thakur v Union of India

The Supreme Court will decide whether the Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 and the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which allow the Union to extend the tenure of the CBI and ED directors, are unconstitutional. The independence of these investigative bodies hangs in the balance of this case.

Pending

Parties

Petitioner: Mahua Moitra; Saket Gokhale; Randeep Singh Surjewala; Manohar Lal Sharma; Jaya Thakur

Lawyers: Nupur Kumar; Gopal Shankaranarayanan; Abhishek Manu Singhvi; Basava Prabhu Patil

Respondent: Union of India; Enforcement Directorate; Central Bureau of Investigation; Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Lawyers: Arvind Kumar Sharma

Case Details

Case Number: WP (C) 456/2022

Next Hearing:

Last Updated: November 28, 2022

Key Issues

1

Are the Amendments that effectively extend the ED Director’s tenure contrary to the SC’s 2021 decision?

2

Do the Amendments violate the principles of fair trial and fair investigation guaranteed under the Rights to Equality and Life?

Case Description

On November 14th, 2021, the President of India passed the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, and the Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021. These Ordinances permit the extension of the tenures of the directors of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) by amending the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (DSPE Act) and the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 (CVC Act). 

The Ordinances were passed without Parliamentary approval, three days before the incumbent ED director, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, was meant to retire. Mr. Mishra’s tenure was promptly extended by a year on November 17th, 2022. Curiously, a Parliamentary session was scheduled to take place two weeks later, on November 29th. 

Both Acts explicitly state that the directors’ tenures should be for ‘not less than two years’. In Common Cause v Union of India (2021) the Supreme Court heard a challenge to the extension of Mr. Mishra’s tenure as ED director for an additional year after his initial two-year tenure expired. The SC held that extensions could be granted in ‘rare and exceptional cases’ for a short period of time. However, they made it clear that no further extension was to be granted to Mr. Mishra. 

The Ordinances allow up to 3 one-year extensions of the CBI and ED director’s tenure. On November 18th, 2021, Mahua Moitra, a Member of Parliament from the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC), and Congress Leader Randeep Singh Surjewala filed petitions at the SC challenging the Ordinances. They argued that the Ordinances overrode and were contrary to the Court’s decision in Common Cause and extend Mr. Mishra’s tenure. 

Further, Ms. Moitra claims that the Ordinances give the Union significant control over the tenure of the directors which would interfere with the independence of the CBI and the ED. This would violate the principles of fair investigation and fair trial that are constitutionally guaranteed under the Rights to Equality and Life

On December 14th, 2021, Parliament enacted the Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Act, 2021, and the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 2021. These Amendments confirmed the provisions for tenure extension that were first passed through the Ordinances. 

While the case remains pending at the SC, the agency under ED director Sanjay Kumar Mishra’s stewardship has arrested several leaders from Opposition parties including Lok Sabha Member Karti Chidambaram and Karnataka Congress President D.K. Shivkumar. On July 27th, 2022 the SC upheld the wide and unchecked investigatory powers granted to the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002

On July 13th, 2022, Congress leader Jaya Thakur, who was among those who challenged the Ordinances, asked the Court to list the challenges to the Amendments, which the SC agreed to. On August 2nd, 2022, a 3-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, and Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli issued notice to the Union government to respond to the challenges.