By reducing the abrogation to presidential discretion, Singh ignores the framework on which the relationship of J&K and Union was predicated

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s judgement, SCO caught up with the constitutional law expert on the past and present of the federal scheme

The Court set a dangerous precedent in the Article 370 case by endorsing the legal jugglery that broke the promise between Union and state

The Article 370 Judgment narrates a lot of history but gives cursory treatment to the present. Meanwhile, the Valley observes silence.

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s upholding of the abrogation of Article 370, detachment and disappointment hang over the capital of J&K

Before the Supreme Court has the last word on J&K’s special status, a reminder of what is at stake

Four cases were in the forefront of the Article 370 Constitution Bench hearings. What was their relevance?

A SC decision from 1968 has long justified Union executive creep in J&K. But what of the equal bench judgement that came a decade before it?

In August, amid constitutional benches and regular hearings, the SC continued to push major institutional reforms.

In 56 days over 5 years, the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly created the J&K Constitution, and joined India on its own terms.

The Bench heard arguments for 60+ hours over 16 days. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal argued the longest, followed by SG Mehta

The SC reserved judgement after hearing arguments from 40 counsel