Thyagarajan Narendran

The GM mustard debate continued at the SC. Does GM mustard pose health risks, or are the concerns a disagreement among scientists?

Two gay couples argue that they are deprived of many rights since same sex marriage is not recognised in India

The Union stated that if the Court starts doubting every appointment, institutions such as the Election Commission may lose their sanctity.

The Bench questioned the Attorney General on the procedure adopted by the government to appoint civil servants to the Election Commission.

ASG Natraj informed the Court that 19 States and Union Territories are yet to identify minorities.

The Bench questioned the Additional Solicitor General If an entire police force cannot keep a watch on an ailing 70 year old man.

The SC heard arguments claiming that summons issued after the conclusion of a trial would be valid if based on sound evidence.

Attorney General R Venkatramani argued that government cannot be held liable for legislator's statement and it will have repercussions

Sr. Adv. P.S. Patwalia argued that new accused cannot be summoned in a trial after the Judgment is pronounced.

SG Mehta told the court that he has to hold consultations with higher level government officers to clarify the Union’s stance.

The Supreme Court has extended the protection granted to the area where the 'Shiva Lingam' was found till further orders

A long drawn PIL has prevented Centre from permitting Genetically Modified mustard to be cultivated commercially since 2004.

MediaOne opposed the practice of handing documents to Court in sealed cover stating that it disadvantages the opposite party

The Court allowed the Petitioners to challenge 104th Constitutional amendment which extended the reservation furthermore

The Bench has appointed nodal counsels to collect and compile documents and judgments from both the sides to ensure seamless hearings

The Court's Monsoon Session saw the revival of Constitution Bench after 15 months, 6 CB's were formed in two months to hear 25 cases

Justice Chandrachud has played a vital role in cementing right to privacy as a fundamental right, by invoking it in important Judgments

The Bench will hear matters on religious excommunication, compensation for Bhopal Gas Tragedy victims and retrospective immunity from arrest

The SC will decide if it can directly grant divorce using Article 142 if the marriage is broken beyond reconciliation

What arguments were made in the challenge to the Hijab Ban in Karnataka? What will the Judgement focus on?

Justice Indira Banerjee's Judgments have left a mark on a variety of subjects.

The Supreme Court heard the Union’s defence in the constitutional challenge to EWS reservations and the Karnataka government's arguments in

Advocate Shadan Farasat argued that backward classes are more likely to be economically weaker and can't be excluded from EWS Reservations.

Mr. Sondhi claimed the Hijab ban violates the fundamental rights of Muslim women. Prof. Kumar argues EWS Reservations violate Equality Code.