In Week 5, Sr. Adv. Rajeev Dhavan argued for the Sunni Waqf Board, primarily focusing on disputing claims made by the Nirmohi Akhara

This week, the hearings in the Ayodhya dispute centered around the possession claim. All three parties relied on archaeological evidence.

In Week 3, Sr. Adv. CS Vaidyanathan, who represents Lord Ram, took the court through the documentary and oral evidence.

DESK BRIEF: In the Ayodhya dispute, the court will break new ground on the extent to which historical and religious materials are admissible

DESK BRIEF: The last week at the Supreme Court saw arguments ranging from social media to historical materials in the 12th century

In week 2 of the Ayodhya hearings, the Court exclusively heard Senior Advocate Vaidyanathan, who argued Lord Ram's suit

In the Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court must come to terms with various legal incarnations of the divine. 

In Week 1 of the Ayodhya hearings, the Court heard submissions from Senior Advocates Jain and Parassaran on behalf of NA and Lord Ram

DESK BRIEF: The Ayodhya case revolves around competing claims from the Nirmohi Akhara, the Hindu Mahasabha, and the Sunni Waqf Board

The Faruqui case appears to have introduced a "particular significance" test for determining whether a feature of a religion is essential.

Tracing the timeline of key events in the Babri Masjid- Ayodhya Title Dispute Case.

Impeachment Motion initiated against Dipak Misra CJI, judgment reserved in Puttuswamy v. UOI and hearings continued in the Ayodhya Dispute.