journal

Analysis

Article 370: The decision in “Prem Nath Kaul” lies conveniently forgotten

A SC decision from 1968 has long justified Union executive creep in J&K. But what of the equal bench judgement that came a decade before it?

27th Sep 2023

More

Analysis

Constitution Benches to become a “permanent feature” of SC: Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

In 2023, a Constitution Bench has assembled almost each month to tackle matters of public importance

and

21st Sep 2023

More

Court Data

Arguments Time Split: Challenge to the abrogation of Article 370

The Bench heard arguments for 60+ hours over 16 days. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal argued the longest, followed by SG Mehta

14th Sep 2023

More

Analysis

Constitutional remedies only for those who will bend the knee?

DESK BRIEF: The Supreme Court demanded a person seeking protection under Article 32 to prove their allegiance to India in an affidavit.

11th Sep 2023

More

Channel

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to the Abrogation of Article 370 | Day 16

The SC reserved judgement after hearing arguments from 40 counsel

11th Sep 2023

More

Analysis

A Tale of Two Constitutions: An Excerpt from ‘A Dismantled State’

The abrogation of Article 370 threatens the safeguards acknowledging special arrangements in other states too, writes Anuradha Bhasin.

24th Aug 2023

More

Channel

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Abrogation of Article 370 | Day 7

Senior Advocates Dave, Naphade and Dwivedi highlighted the adverse consequences of the abrogation of Article 370.

17th Aug 2023

More
Article 370

Analysis

Article 370 of the Constitution: A Timeline

SCO tracks the evolution of Article 370 from 1947.

31st Jul 2023

More
Abrogation of Article 370

Analysis

Understanding the Abrogation of Article 370: Origin and Impact

The Supreme Court will decide the extent of the Union’s powers to make laws for Jammu and Kashmir and abrogate Article 370.

29th Jul 2023

More

cases

Subhash Desai v Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra

The Supreme Court referred Nabam Rebia v Deputy Speaker (2016) to a larger Bench. It held that the Governor had no objective material to call for a floor test. Further, it stated the speaker would decide whether the Eknath Shinde faction had defected from the Shiv Sena.

More