The Court’s performance this year was more defined by what it didn’t do than what it did—no hearing for the Hijab Ban and Sabarimala cases

Interim Orders protect the interests of all parties while a case is pending. In some cases, the SC struggles to maintain that balance.

SC Judgments in the challenge to the Hijab Ban and on abortion laws for married women were important milestones in equality for women.

Major cases seemingly made little progress in October while the SC’s long series of retirements continued.

The Hijab Ban case is set to continue at the SC after the 2-Judge Bench delivered a split verdict in October. What's the story so far?

The split verdict in Karnataka’s Hijab Ban cases isn’t a rare occurrence. How does the Court deal with such cases?

A 2-Judge Bench of the SC delivered a split verdict on Karnataka’s Hijab Ban, which means the case will be deliberated for a 3rd time!

Justice Hemant Gupta authored impactful Judgments in criminal law cases and a controversial Judgment on his penultimate day at the SC.

On October 13th, the bench comprising Justices Gupta and Dhulia delivered a split verdict in the Hijab Ban case. What next?

These include questions on equality, religious freedom, privacy, right to education & free speech and expression.

DESK BRIEF: Arguments on Religion took over half the SC time, despite all parties agreeing that it should not be the focus of the case.

What arguments were made in the challenge to the Hijab Ban in Karnataka? What will the Judgement focus on?