In the month of September the Supreme Court heard multiple important matters including the Aadhar case and the Ayodhya title dispute.

Last week, the counsels for the Sunni Waqf Board concluded their responses.

The week witnessed Sr. Adv Dhavan, appearing for the Sunni Waqf Board, continue his arguments

DESK BRIEF: The strategy of the parties is to focus on adjudicating Ayodhya as a property dispute rather than on core constitutional values

Week 6 saw Sr. Adv. Rajeev Dhavan and Sr. Adv. Jilani continued their arguments for the Sunni Waqf Board

In Week 5, Sr. Adv. Rajeev Dhavan argued for the Sunni Waqf Board, primarily focusing on disputing claims made by the Nirmohi Akhara

This week, the hearings in the Ayodhya dispute centered around the possession claim. All three parties relied on archaeological evidence.

In Week 3, Sr. Adv. CS Vaidyanathan, who represents Lord Ram, took the court through the documentary and oral evidence.

DESK BRIEF: In the Ayodhya dispute, the court will break new ground on the extent to which historical and religious materials are admissible

DESK BRIEF: The last week at the Supreme Court saw arguments ranging from social media to historical materials in the 12th century

In week 2 of the Ayodhya hearings, the Court exclusively heard Senior Advocate Vaidyanathan, who argued Lord Ram's suit

In the Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court must come to terms with various legal incarnations of the divine.